Eulerian simulation of bubble columns reactors and effect of various parameters on the gas holdup

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran


Gas holdup and bubble size are important parameters for simulation and designing in bubble column reactors. Because based on these parameters, the available gas-liquid interfacial area is defined for mass transfer. In this paper, the results of applying magnetic fields on the velocity field and volume fraction of gas holdup are reported. Hydrodynamics of the bubble column in the reactors is investigated numerically using Euler-Euler model, standard k-ε turbulence model considering axisymmetric assumption, and the control volume technique. The results show that the magnetic fields have minor effects on increasing the volume fraction of gas holdup, but it causes to change in the flow field and vortex. In addition, effects of other parameters as well as rotation of the fluid, bubble size, and variation of inlet velocity on the volume fraction of gas holdup have been presented.


Main Subjects

[1]   Akhtar, M. A., “Two Fluid Eulerian Simulation of Bubble Column Reactors with Distributors”, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, Vol. 8, pp. 831-841, (2006).
[2]   Joshi, J. B., “Computational Flow Modeling and Design of Bubble Column Reactors”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 56, pp. 5893-5933, (2001).
[3]   Ali, B. A., “Analysis of Liquid Circulation in a Rectangular Tank with a Gas Source at a Corner”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 144, pp. 442–452, (2008).
[4]   Pfleger, D., and Becker, S., “Modelling and Simulation of the Dynamic Flow Behavior in a Bubble Column”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 56, pp. 1737-1747, (2001).
[5]   Mudde, R. F., and Simonin, O., “Two-and Three-dimensional Simulations of a Bubble Plume using a Two-fluid Model”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 54, pp. 5061-5069, (1999).
[6]   Pfleger, D., and Gomes, S., “Hydrodynamic Simulations of Laboratory Scale Bubble Columns Fundamental Studies of the Eulerian-Eulerian Modeling Approach”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 54, pp. 5091-5099, (1999).
[7]   Dhotre, M. T., and Ekambara, K., “CFD Simulation of Sparger Design and Height to Diameter Ratio on Gas Holdup Profiles in Bubble Column Reactors”, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 28, pp. 407-421, (2004).
[8]   Sokolichin, A., and Eigenberger, G., “Applicability of the Standard k-ε Turbulence Model to the Dynamic Simulation of Bubble Column: Part I. Detailed Numerical Simulations”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 54, pp. 2273-2284, (1999).
[9]   Buwa, V.V., and Ranade, V., “Dynamics of Gas Liquid Flow in a Rectangular Bubble Column: Experiments and Single /Multi-Group CFD Simulations”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 57, pp. 4715-4736, (2002).
[10]  Dhotre, M. T., Niceno, B., and Smith, B.L., “Large Eddy Simulation of a Bubble Column using Dynamic Sub-grid Scale Model”, Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 136, pp. 337-348, (2008).
[11]  Kamiyama, S., Ueno, K., and Yokota, Y., “Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Gas Liquid Two Phase Flow of Magnetic Fluid”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 201, pp. 271-275, (1999).
[12]  Tagawa, T., “Numerical Simulation of Two Phase Flows in the Presence of a Magnetic Field”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 72, pp. 212-219, (2006).
[13]  Sivasankaran, S., and Ho, C. J., “Effect of Temperature Dependent Properties on MHD Convection of Water near its Density Maximum in a Square Cavity”, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Vol. 47, pp. 1184-1194, (2008).
[14]  Davidson, P.A., “An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics”, University of Cambridge   Press, New York, (2001).